<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should Brands Join or Build Their Own Social Network?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://timelliott.us/2007/12/18/should-brands-join-or-build-their-own-social-network/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://timelliott.us/2007/12/18/should-brands-join-or-build-their-own-social-network/</link>
	<description>Marketing Technopologist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 23:16:44 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Facebook A Roach Motel? &#124; tim elliott's blog</title>
		<link>http://timelliott.us/2007/12/18/should-brands-join-or-build-their-own-social-network/comment-page-1/#comment-4342</link>
		<dc:creator>Facebook A Roach Motel? &#124; tim elliott's blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 17:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timelliott.us/2007/12/18/should-brands-join-or-build-their-own-social-network/#comment-4342</guid>
		<description>[...] I wrote last month, I think companies should use existing social networks like Facebook to engage their customers and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I wrote last month, I think companies should use existing social networks like Facebook to engage their customers and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://timelliott.us/2007/12/18/should-brands-join-or-build-their-own-social-network/comment-page-1/#comment-4314</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 22:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timelliott.us/2007/12/18/should-brands-join-or-build-their-own-social-network/#comment-4314</guid>
		<description>Doc,

I love rhetorical questions so I&#039;ll take your bait here... yes, blogging is social, it&#039;s also personal and just one tool a company has to engage their customers. A company or brand can&#039;t blog (or podcast) as a unit; only their people can as individuals. Since Apple currently only leaks from the top, no blogs are allowed (although I think the real Steve would make an instant A-list, must read).

I also agree with Hugh that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gapingvoid.com/Moveable_Type/archives/001068.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;branding is dead&lt;/a&gt;... it will just twitch a bit longer until us Boomer&#039;s stop buying stuff. Our kids are not brand buyers; they are social buyers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doc,</p>
<p>I love rhetorical questions so I&#8217;ll take your bait here&#8230; yes, blogging is social, it&#8217;s also personal and just one tool a company has to engage their customers. A company or brand can&#8217;t blog (or podcast) as a unit; only their people can as individuals. Since Apple currently only leaks from the top, no blogs are allowed (although I think the real Steve would make an instant A-list, must read).</p>
<p>I also agree with Hugh that <a href="http://www.gapingvoid.com/Moveable_Type/archives/001068.html" rel="nofollow">branding is dead</a>&#8230; it will just twitch a bit longer until us Boomer&#8217;s stop buying stuff. Our kids are not brand buyers; they are social buyers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doc Searls</title>
		<link>http://timelliott.us/2007/12/18/should-brands-join-or-build-their-own-social-network/comment-page-1/#comment-4313</link>
		<dc:creator>Doc Searls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timelliott.us/2007/12/18/should-brands-join-or-build-their-own-social-network/#comment-4313</guid>
		<description>I think Apple provides an interesting example of how the best brands are in some ways the least social.

Name more than a handful of Apple bloggers. In fact, name *one*. 

There&#039;s an old thread worth following here. Some links:

http://doc-weblogs.com/2004/10/19#thoughtForTheDay

A question... Is blogging being &quot;social&quot;? Just wondering. Not sure.

http://doc-weblogs.com/2005/12/30#testingATheoryOnCorporateBlogging</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Apple provides an interesting example of how the best brands are in some ways the least social.</p>
<p>Name more than a handful of Apple bloggers. In fact, name *one*. </p>
<p>There&#8217;s an old thread worth following here. Some links:</p>
<p><a href="http://doc-weblogs.com/2004/10/19#thoughtForTheDay" rel="nofollow">http://doc-weblogs.com/2004/10/19#thoughtForTheDay</a></p>
<p>A question&#8230; Is blogging being &#8220;social&#8221;? Just wondering. Not sure.</p>
<p><a href="http://doc-weblogs.com/2005/12/30#testingATheoryOnCorporateBlogging" rel="nofollow">http://doc-weblogs.com/2005/12/30#testingATheoryOnCorporateBlogging</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
